When Free Speech and Privacy Collide: Why Strict Scrutiny Is a Poor Fit for Nonconsensual Pornography Laws

Introduction While dating her boyfriend, Akhil Patel, of seven years, Nadia Hussain did what so many people of her generation have done: she sent him emails with nude photos of herself and engaged in video sex via Skype. Although she told him to delete the photos, he never did. He betrayed her trust even further by secretly recording their video sessions. After Nadia broke up with Patel, he started to lash out at her via text message, threatening to send… Read More

RLUIPA’s Hidden Third-Party Harms on Landowners and Local Governments

Introduction The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) governs two broad areas of local and state government regulation: religious land-use regulation and religious regulations governing institutionalized persons. This Note focuses on the land-use regulation portion of the law. In particular, the purpose of this Note is to examine the negative external impacts the law creates. When a law benefiting one group negatively impacts another group, the negatively impacted group is called a third party. In the… Read More

Suffering Uncompounded: Civilizing Healthcare Standards for Gender Dysphoric Prisoners

Introduction In the recently decided case of Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision highly relevant to the still-developing field of transgender rights in the United States. As a transgender prisoner of the Idaho Department of Corrections (IDOC) suffering from the debilitating psychological effects of severe gender dysphoria (GD), Edmo was denied the opportunity to pursue gender confirmation surgery (GCS) in an effort to alleviate her symptoms. Although Adree Edmo… Read More

Zoning and the Cost of Housing: Evidence from Silicon Valley, Greater New Haven, and Greater Austin

Municipal zoning, shockingly, may be the most consequential regulatory program in the United States. This Article develops metrics for measuring the extent to which a locality’s zoning practices are exclusionary, that is, limit construction of least-cost housing. It applies the metrics to actual zoning ordinances and zoning maps, materials that legal scholars have seldom closely appraised. The municipalities chosen for study lie in three metropolitan areas, the ones listed in the Article’s title. Of the three, zoning in Greater Austin,… Read More

Winning, Defined? Text-Mining Arbitration Decisions

Who wins in consumer arbitration? Historically, this question has been nearly impossible to answer, as most arbitration proceedings are a private black box, and arbitral forums release only limited summary statistics. One exception is the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which arbitrates virtually all disputes between investors and stockbroker-dealers, and makes all of its nearly 60,000 written arbitration decisions publicly available in an online database. This Article is the first to use computational text analysis tools to study these decisions,… Read More

Rethinking Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Enforcement

Prosecutorial discretion in immigration enforcement stands at a crossroads. It was the centerpiece of Obama’s immigration policy after efforts to pass comprehensive immigration reform failed. Under the Trump administration, it was declared all but dead, replaced by an ethos of maximum enforcement. Biden has promised a return to the status quo ante, but the record of using prosecutorial discretion to accomplish humanitarian goals in immigration enforcement under Obama was, at best, mixed. Moreover, it is unclear whether Biden can depend… Read More

Fighting Chance: Conflicts over Risk in Social Change Litigation

Drawing on a case study of marriage equality litigation, this Article examines how practice setting affects the construction of risk and the emergence of conflict in social change litigation. Although private law firms often work collaboratively with social movement organizations to pursue common goals, conflicts also emerge when movement groups oppose “risky” private litigation which could imperil the movement’s ongoing impact litigation strategies. How do attorneys in private firms and social movement organizations vary in their framing of risk in… Read More

Legalizing Undocumented Work

An estimated eight million undocumented workers live as a subclass of workers in the United States. Their essential work is cast in a shadow of “illegality” because federal immigration law prohibits employers from hiring such workers. As a result, undocumented workers are relegated to low-paying jobs in specific industries, such as agriculture, construction, or domestic work. Employers can easily take advantage of such workers by paying them less than the minimum wage or requiring them to work under dangerous conditions.

Corporate Law, Retooled: How Books and Records Revamped Judicial Oversight

In a string of landmark corporate law rulings in the mid-2010s (most notably, Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings), Delaware’s Supreme Court supposedly relaxed the standards of judicial review across a wide range of business transactions. Commentators predicted that this development would render corporate law irrelevant to the regulation of business behavior, thereby insulating managers from accountability and leading to a deterioration in corporate governance. Yet recent empirical studies have refuted the predictions: directors operating under the revamped decisional law still… Read More

Commandeering the Indian Child Welfare Act: Native American Rights Exception to Tenth Amendment Challenges

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has challenged the constitutionality of legislation that has remained at the core of tribal sovereignty since its enactment. The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) was passed as a reparative response to the forced removal of Native American4 children nationwide from their families and tribes and placement into the adoption and foster care systems.